[389-users] can the 389 directory substitute for active directory?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [389-users] can the 389 directory substitute for active directory?
From: Ralph Blach <chipperb@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:29:37 -0400
Delivered-to: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100402 Fedora/2.0.4-1.fc12 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

Can 389 server substitute for a windows active directory server?

Thanks

Chip
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Prev by Date: [389-users] nsAIMpresence error
Next by Date: Re: [389-users] Referral and Read-Only Replica Consumer
Previous by thread: [389-users] nsAIMpresence error
Next by thread: [389-users] PasswordExpirationTime
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Directory Users] [Fedora Directory Devel] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Kernel] [Fedora Legacy] [Share Photos] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux