me wrote: > hi Rich > do you know why it all broke so suddenly with latest update for base policy? > yes - miscommuncation between the 389 team and the selinux team > for some users it could be kind of a disaster, if now base policy is > lacking rules for 389 > then some other dependencies, like ones you said of, should be pulled in > automatically > for me it looked like that, everything just crashed, like if there was > no major part > of 389's things in base selinux policy. > The selinux team would like packages that are selinux aware to provide their own policy which is what 389 will be doing from now on. > I've just yumed 389-ds and no extra deps were looked for with regards to > selinux > tracking seliunx events and rendering custom module for inevitable > I guess lots of people on F12 were having lots of problems today > I'm still trying to get my F12 system up to date. I would guess the 389-ds package has not yet hit the mirrors. > cheers > > On 03/03/2010 03:07 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> me wrote: >> >> >>> regards >>> >>> >>> >> 389-ds-base 1.2.6.a2 has a selinux sub-package - 389-ds-base-selinux - >> and 389-admin-1.1.11.a2 also - 389-admin-selinux - these are currently >> in the testing repos - yum install/upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing >> 389-ds-base-selinux 389-admin-selinux >> Not sure if these packages have hit all of the mirrors yet, but if they >> have, try them out (and give us some feedback!) >> >> >>> -- >>> 389 users mailing list >>> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >> >> > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
