> Which yum repo? Note that all of the new 389 packages are in EPEL now - > see http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes I didn't change the yum repo from when I first installed fedora-ds. I mistakenly assumed that the developers would not move the repo around once they set it up. I have removed all the packages, set up the new repo, and used yum to reinstall them all. > > 389-admin-1.1.10 fixes a problem with SELinux support (quite possibly > the one you had to turn off SELinux to get around). Ok, that's fine, I have disabled SElinux as it's generally more trouble than it's worth IMHO. Too many little gotchas with various software packages. At least I will leave it off until I can get the directory server somewhat functional. > Does 389-console -D 9 produce any output whatsoever???? Yes, this time it produced some output. There seems to be something preventing all the GUI text from rendering correctly. http://carolan.ws/console.log I downloaded the windows version of the management console and it seems to be working now! Kind of a hacky solution but that's how Linux users roll eh? I'll play with this some more and see if I can get some other servers using it for authentication now. thanks for all your help. Sean -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
