Re: [389-users] active directory password sync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ldap Tester wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Ldap Tester <ldap.tester@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:ldap.tester@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Ldap Tester
>     <ldap.tester@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:ldap.tester@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>         I have two 389 servers, one under fedora 12 and one under
>         fedora 11.
>         They have the following packages:
>
>         389-admin-1.1.9-1.fc12.x86_64
>         389-admin-console-1.1.4-2.fc12.noarch
>         389-admin-console-doc-1.1.4-2.fc12.noarch
>         389-adminutil-1.1.8-4.fc12.x86_64
>         389-console-1.1.3-5.fc12.noarch
>         389-ds-1.1.3-5.fc12.noarch
>         389-ds-base-1.2.5-1.fc12.x86_64
>         389-ds-base-devel-1.2.5-1.fc12.x86_64
>         389-ds-console-1.2.0-5.fc12.noarch
>         389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-5.fc12.noarch
>         389-dsgw-1.1.4-1.fc12.x86_64
>
>         389-admin-1.1.8-4.fc11.x86_64
>         389-admin-console-1.1.4-1.fc11.noarch
>         389-admin-console-doc-1.1.4-1.fc11.noarch
>         389-adminutil-1.1.8-3.fc11.x86_64
>         389-console-1.1.3-4.fc11.noarch
>         389-ds-1.1.3-4.fc11.noarch
>         389-ds-base-1.2.5-1.fc11.x86_64
>         389-ds-base-devel-1.2.5-1.fc11.x86_64
>         389-ds-console-1.2.0-4.fc11.noarch
>         389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-4.fc11.noarch
>         389-dsgw-1.1.4-1.fc11.x86_64
>
>         There are set up as multi masters.
>
>         I also have a windows 2003 Active Directory server.
>         I have password sync'ing set up between the AD and the fedora
>         12 389 server.
>
>         This has been working for several years.
>         I have recently noticed a problem that may have existed for
>         some time now, maybe always.
>
>         If I change a user password via windows, everything works as
>         expected.
>         The password changes on windows and both fedora machines.
>         If I change a user password via the fedora 12 machine,
>         the one that has the sync agreement with the windows machine,
>         again, everything works as expected,
>         The password changes on windows and both fedora machines.
>
>         However, if I change a user password via the fedora 11 machine,
>         the one that does not have the sync agreement with the windows
>         machine,
>         then, the password changes on both fedora machines,
>         but NOT on the windows machine.
>
>         This is not how it is supposed to work, right?
>
>         I have looked at all sorts of logs, and still have now clue as
>         to the problem.
>         (I do not believe it is a fedora 11 versus fedora 12 problem.)
>         Does anybody have any ideas?
>
>
>     I had the same scenario.
>
>     Remember that the encrypted passwords are not synchronized with
>     Windows. 
>
>     When you change your password on your F11, it is stored encrypted. Then
>
>     MMR transmits "userPassword 'encrypted on your F12. Therefore, the
>
>     password does not synchronize with Windows, since as already mentioned,
>     is encrypted.
>
>     In my case, I decided to change to a Master / Slave scenario. Thus, your
>     F11 will be to read only and such changes will be forwarded to your F12
>
>
>     (this includes passwd) which will be written.
>
>
>     Greetings
>
>     P.D.: I apologize for my poor English.
>     -- 
>     Sergio A. Morales <sergiomorales at archlinux.cl <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users>>
>
>
>     uSCI & CSRG Sysadmin
>     Archlinux Chile
>
>
>
>     But I have set
>     pam_password clear
>     in /etc/ldap.conf on both fedora machines.
>     I rely on ssl for security.
>     I had to do this in order to get password syncing with windows to work at all.
>
>
>     Shouldn't that take care of the problem you describe above?
>         
>
>
>
> Also, look at 
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Windows_Sync.html
> figure 9.2
> That implies that it should work with my setup, right?
It should, but that doc appears to be wrong.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux