Prashanth Sundaram wrote:
Rich,
I specify the individual host’s FQDN in the replication agreement.
So, ldap01.domain.com ?
Maybe openldap/openssl has a problem with subjectAltName? Try mozldap
ldapsearch instead like this:
/usr/lib/mozldap/ldapsearch -h FQDN -ZZZ -P /etc/dirsrv/slapd-instance
-s base -b "" "objectclass=*"
I use haproxy for LB, so the hosts are in ACTIVE-PASSIVE state.
Prashanth Sundaram wrote:
Hi All,
Which one of the case below is suitable for a Multi-Master
replication. I have a load balancer with/ ldap.domain.com,/ which
is what clients will use to authenticate.
*_Question:
_*Which one is a better implementation? What are the trade-offs?
Please input your feedback as it might be useful for someone
coming this way later. This can serve as a knowledge bank.
Case-I
ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap01.domain.com,
subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
ldap02: server-cert with cn=ldap02.domain.com,
subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
-MMR with tls throws error when “*Check hostname against name in
certificate for outbound SSL connections”* option is enabled. But
RH recommends it to be turned ON.
What is the FQDN you specified in the replication agreement?
Case-II
ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com,
subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com, ldap02.domain.com ldap01:
server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com,
subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com,ldap02.domain.com -Does not comply
with the requirement that “server-cert” should have hostname as
cn.I found this method working perfectly fine.
*Knowledge Sharing:
*Here’s a useful link which I use all the time and look before
posting to the list. This is the archive for the mailing list and
has /search/ feature which very useful.
http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-directory-users redhat
com/info.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
389 users mailing list
389-users redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00006.html>
][Date Next
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00008.html>
] [Thread Prev
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00006.html>
][Thread Next
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00008.html>
] [Thread Index
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/thread.html#00007>
] [Date Index
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/date.html#00007>
] [Author Index
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/author.html#00007>
]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
