Which one of the case below is suitable for a Multi-Master replication. I have a load balancer with ldap.domain.com, which is what clients will use to authenticate.
Question:
Which one is a better implementation? What are the trade-offs? Please input your feedback as it might be useful for someone coming this way later. This can serve as a knowledge bank.
Case-I
ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap01.domain.com, subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
ldap02: server-cert with cn=ldap02.domain.com, subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
-MMR with tls throws error when “Check hostname against name in certificate for outbound SSL connections” option is enabled. But RH recommends it to be turned ON.
Case-II
ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com, subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com, ldap02.domain.com
ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com, subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com,ldap02.domain.com
-Does not comply with the requirement that “server-cert” should have hostname as cn.I found this method working perfectly fine.
Knowledge Sharing:
Here’s a useful link which I use all the time and look before posting to the list. This is the archive for the mailing list and has search feature which very useful.
http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx/info.html
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
