On 12/08/2009 09:09 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Andrey Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
2009/12/8 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>:
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release
Candidate 2 of version 1.2.5.
Well, this time the installation (compiled from sources) was ok. I've
also imported my ldif export from 1.1 server.
Excellent - good to know.
The only catch was the
syntax check (nsslapd-syntaxcheck: on) - had to disable it because
of some expiration dates of Generalized Time syntax that were rather
approximative (something like X-expirationDate: 201012). The
telephoneNumber, on the other hand, is not validated, as far as i
understand...
You have attribute values that use telephoneNumber syntax, that are
not correct syntax, that the server accepts?
I think Andrey is just referring to the fact that the Telephone Number
syntax is "loose". It is simply defined as a "PrintableString" in RFC
4517. We do validate that it meets this criteria, however it's unlikely
that one would have something in there that violates the syntax. The
Generalized Time syntax is highly structured on the other hand.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
