Re: [389-users] SNMP trouble

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/07/2009 03:41 AM, Mitja Mihelic( wrote:
Has anyone managed to get SNMP working ?
Yes, it does work. The problem areas for most during setup seem to be communication between the master agent and the subagent (the subagent logs should indicate if this is a problem when you start it), and access control configuration of the master agent. Perhaps your community does not have rights to see everything?
Mitja Mihelic wrote:
Nathan Kinder wrote:

On 12/01/2009 07:21 AM, Mitja Mihelic( wrote:

Hi!

I have set up SNMP on our server.


What platform are you on and what version of 389 are you using?

It's not the 389 server exactly. It's centos-ds-8.1.0-1.el5.centos.2 run
on the current CentOS 5.4


What does your configuration file look like for the ldap-agent
subagent?  Did you configure it to communicate with snmpd via agentx?
Do the ldap-agent logs show anything?

The first two lines in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
   master agentx
   mibdirs +/usr/share/dirsrv/mibs

Contents of the etc/dirsrv/snmp-agent/ldap-agent.conf
   agentx-master /var/agentx/master
   agent-logdir /var/log/dirsrv/snmp-agent/
   server slapd-SERVER-users

The ldap-agent logs shows the following, repeated every 15s or so:
   2009-12-02 10:10:09 Reloading stats.
   2009-12-02 10:10:09 Opening stats file
(/var/run/dirsrv/slapd-SERVER-users.stats) for server: 389

The ldap-agent was run like so (in debug mode just in case):
   ldap-agent -D /etc/dirsrv/snmp-agent/ldap-agent.conf


While it responds to my queries it reports only data from the OID
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.6.5.1 (dsEntityEntry)

All other variables seem to be empty.

For instance, a query for .1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.6.3.1.9 (dsURL) :
[host] snmpwalk -Cp -On -v 1 -c comunity localhost
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.6.3.1.9
Variables found: 0

The same happens if I do it a bit further up the tree:
[host] snmpwalk -Cp -On -v 1 -c comunity localhost .1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.6
(rhds)
Only the values from dsEntityEntry are returned.

I am lost here...

Regards,
Mitja

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux