Brodie, Kent wrote:
hmm - it's not supposed to - 1.2.3 is only in the testing repository, which is not enabled by default - what platform are you running?The yum update defaults to the latest, 1.2.3.
-----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:30 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-users] *Big* thank you for developers Brodie, Kent wrote:Previous setup: Fedora directory server 1.2.0. ssl, replication all running.wentCurrent setup: 389 dir server, $latest.I cannot state enough how pleased I am with the upgrade. The instructions on the web page were flawless, the update was frankly, probably the simplest thing I've done this week on a software package system that's the most complex and critical of what I currently manage. I half expected SOME hiccups, errors, or things out of sync, or broken replication, or SOMETHING... and so on. Instead-- it justflawlessly. Awesome. Absolutely awesome. Keep up the good work.Thanks! By $latest did you mean 1.2.2 or 1.2.3?--Kent C. Brodie, Medical College of Wisconsin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
