Rich Megginson wrote:
Anne Cross wrote:
We have two AD servers, and we're working on having four 389 Masters
geographically distributed, multi-mastered between them, etc, etc,
etc. The goal here is to stop having network hiccups take things out.
The AD servers talk to each other nigh-on instantaneously. Likewise
for the 389 servers. Is it safe to set up sync agreements to *both*
AD servers, in case one goes down?
No. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182515 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184155
Ah. OK, so that *is* a bug, and hopefully will get fixed at some future
date. Good to know for now, however. Passwords continue to plague us,
but that will be an email for another day. (With a lot more in the way
of logs attached to it.)
--
,___,
{o,o} Anne "Juniper" Cross
(___) Senior Linux Systems Engineer and Extropic Crusader
-"-"-- Information Technology, ITA Software
/^^^
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
