Re: [389-users] Multimaster replication

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

Thanks for the answer. Now we have more than fifty servers (more than
twenty organizations, each with at least two servers), each one with
about the same number of replication agreements, and we are not having
any problems about resource limits. Each server has its own database
in multimaster mode and the databases of the other organizations in
hub mode. We thought there were a limit of four (4) servers per
multimaster replica; the biggest organization will have now 6 servers,
each one with the replica of its database in multimaster mode, so
that's my question.

Anyone has multimaster replicas with such number of servers? Any suggestions?

Regards.

2009/10/20 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Has 389DS any limit of servers for multimaster replication? If so,
>> what is the best option to have any number of servers with read/write
>> databases and replication agreements among them?
>>
>
> The upper limit on the number of replicas is 65534 - we use a short integer
> field for the master replica ID.
> However, long before that, you will likely run into resource limits.  For
> example, each replication agreement uses at least one thread and sometimes
> two.  This will use memory and CPU resources.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> --

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux