Ankur Agarwal wrote:
> I want to achieve chaining between a master and slave having exactly same OUs and are based on OpenLDAP 2.3.
>
> What would be the configuration to achieve that?
>
So 389 is the proxy server and openldap is hosting the real data? It
should just work. Have you tried this configuration? If so, what
problems did you encounter?
> Regards,
> Ankur
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Rich Megginson <
rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ankur Agarwal wrote:
> Thanks Rich...Would it be possible for you to share some configuration details to achieve this for OpenLDAP version 2.3?
>
> To achieve what exactly for OpenLDAP 2.3? Chain from 389 to
OpenLDAP?
>
> Cheers,
> A
>
> --- On *Mon, 10/12/09, Rich Megginson /<
rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: Rich Megginson <
rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write
> To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server
> project." <
fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 10:47 AM
>
> Ankur Agarwal wrote:
> >
Can i use chaining between master-slave without having different
> "ou"?
> > I mean if i have exactly same directory structure and same set
> of OUs
> > can i still have chaining between master and slave?
> >
> Yes.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ankur
> >
> >
> > --- On *Thu, 10/8/09, Michael Ströder /<
michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <
http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>/*
> wrote:
> >
>
>
> > From: Michael Ströder <
michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <
http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write
> > To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server
> > project." <
fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx> <
http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx>>
> > Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 1:38 AM
> >
> > Ankur Agarwal wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a master-slave set-up with write operations always
> being
> > done to
> > > the master node. Now there is an issue where i need to
> read some
> > data
> > > immediately after write, and my read request goes to the
>
slave.
> > It fails
> > > in cases when replication hasnt happened from master to
> slave before
> > > this read operation.
> >
> > You simply should not do that. Read from the master if you
> have to
> > rely on the
> > consistency of what you recently wrote to the master.
> >
> > > Is there a LDAP level configuration to handle this situation?
> > > Can chaining help in this case?
> >
> > No. (Except chaining the read requests of
the writing client to
> > the master
> > which you don't want I guess).
> >
> > Ciao, Michael.
> >
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> >
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx> <
http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > <
http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> >
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx> <
http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users> >
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
>
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx> <
http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
>
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
>
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users>
>
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
>
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users>
