Re: [389-users] Tunning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bonjour Emmanuel,

you may take a look at this thread :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2009-June/msg00178.html,
the matter is discussed in details. Using indexes where necessary is
generally your best bet :)

Here is our memory config for about 8000 entries :
#dn: cn=config,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config
# nsslapd-lookthroughlimit: 20000
# nsslapd-dbcachesize: 268435456
# nsslapd-db-checkpoint-interval: 15
#
#dn: cn=NetscapeRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config
# nsslapd-cachememsize: 5242880 (memoire en octets, 5Mo, la base est petite)
# nsslapd-cachesize: -1 (nombre max des entrees, on laisse par defaut)
#
#dn: cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config
# nsslapd-cachememsize: 104857600 (en moyenne, selon mes experiences,
5ko/entree - taille pour 20000 entrees)
# nsslapd-cachesize: -1 (nombre max des entrees, on laisse par defaut)

@+

2009/9/21 Emmanuel BILLOT <emmanuel.billot@xxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm searching for a best practive documentation about tunning DB, like
> nsslapd-lookthroughlimit
> nsslapd-sizelimit
>
> Our DIT contains 20 000 entries, what parameters can we use and how for having a best configured dirsrv ?
>
> RG,

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux