Re: Proper upgrading procedure and the use of setup-ds-admin.pl -u

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony Joseph Messina wrote:
I am currently running the following:
389-admin-1.1.8-3.fc11.x86_64
the new version is 389-admin-1.1.8-4
389-admin-console-1.1.4-1.fc11.noarch
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.4-1.fc11.noarch
389-adminutil-1.1.8-3.fc11.x86_64
389-console-1.1.3-3.fc11.noarch
389-ds-1.1.3-4.fc11.noarch
389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64
the new version is 389-ds-base-1.2.2-1
389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64
389-ds-console-1.2.0-4.fc11.noarch
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-4.fc11.noarch
389-dsgw-1.1.4-1.fc11.x86_64

Those are the packages that were the initial group that supported the renaming of Fedora DS to 389 DS. I plan to upgrade with "yum upgrade" today as some bugs have been fixed.
Ok. Do not upgrade until the new versions specified above are available from your repo.
What is the proper upgrading procedure for 389 DS?

Can I simply do a "yum update" and expect everything to work or do I always need to merge rpmnew files and run setup-ds-admin.pl after each "yum update"?
You should do a yum upgrade instead of update so that obsoletes will be processed correctly.

Then do setup-ds-admin.pl -u

I don't think there is any merging that needs to be done, but it wouldn't hurt just to check the diff between file and file.rpmnew to see if anything has changed (that you didn't set in your configuration).
I ask for two reasons:

1) I was hit by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518418 and have since recreated my servers with the above packages

2) I noticed that while using SSL, the setup-ds-admin.pl requires me to delete the CA cert that was previously installed and re-import it (crazy).
Yes, this is a bug.   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501846
I'd like to make sure don't have these servers crap out again.
Due to the rename issue, your servers will be stopped and restarted, but you should not lose your run level configuration. In what other way(s) did they "crap out"?
Thanks a lot.

-A
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux