-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I successfully setup heartbeat and glusterfs (instead of DRBD) to provide an HA Samba configuration. I tested that fail over worked fine all the existing computers were able to get to their shares and re authenticate users. However I discovered that I was not able to join computers to the domain after the configuration was setup. The netbios name was changed to accommodate the new heartbeat VIP and the new VIP is the only address I have samba bound to. When I go to add the computer to the domain, type to the domain in and hit enter, I am presented with a login dialog box. When I enter the admin and password and hit enter, after a few seconds I get the warning that a controller for the domain could not be foumd. I suspect that there is some caching going on and (maybe) winbind is using the old info for the PDC and not the new? Are there any caches I could clear that may fix this? Am I on the right track or is there somethign else I should be looking at? When I compare the ldap access logs with and without heartbeat, there is a difference in the query. As I previously mentioned, without heartbeat, adding is successful, with heartbeat it is not. I found that the search base is different: With heartbeat - SRCH base="cn=groups,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=com" scope=2 filter="(&(objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(gidNumber=99))" attrs="gidNumber sambaSID sambaGroupType sambaSIDList description displayName cn objectClass" W/heartbeat - SRCH base="sambaDomainName=exampleHQ,sambaDomainName=exampleHQ,dc=example,dc=com" scope=2 filter="(&(objectClass=sambaTrustedDomainPassword)(sambaDomainName=exampleHQ))" attrs=ALL When I compared the logs when executing pdbedit -Lv with both setups, the queries are the same. Why would samba do a different query to the same instance of ldap when configured with heartbeat and without heartbeat? The address that samba is binding to/from for access to ldap is not the VIP provided by heartbeat. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpzTW4ACgkQ5B+8XEnAvqub1ACdGFBhVRaePH0fuTD0mORGIMgB V48AnR0znBY9KD3nhYYdPtR2dQXUWxBO =jrTm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
