Re: [389-users] Performance cuestions about ds.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:34:23 +0100 (GMT+01:00), Julio Gómez
>>> Belmonte <julio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

> a directory with a large number of entries, ~ 20,000
> objects.

That is a directory of a very small size. 'grep' of a 20,000
LDIF text file takes very little time.

> My question is: When I receive a too large query, the
> directory will be suspended until they answer this query.

That depends on how it is configured. And it is hard for me to
imagine a realistic query over 20,000 records that takes a
significant amount of time.

> [ ... ] When I run the directory, I get a single process
> (ns-slapd) which is consuming 100% CPU when doing too long
> queries, [ ... ]

At a site I am familiar with the FDS 'slapd' *always* consumes
100% CPU time (RHEL 4), even if the queries are very simple
lookup ('passwd' emulation) and there are only a few queries per
second. I suspect a bug in 'slapd', and I looked briefly into it
and it seemed to me either a busy-lock bug or a a case where the
DB indices get corrupted.

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux