Andrey Ivanov wrote:
2008/12/9 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>>Andrey Ivanov wrote: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 4:26:08 PM, you wrote: RM> Andrey Ivanov wrote:There is a special type of indexing for the VLV sort searches but I have not found what sort of index I should create to make the server-side sort on a certain attribute optimized.RM> I think each attribute you want to sort by must be indexed for equality. No, it does not seem to be sufficient. I have activated all the indexes for the attribute (sn), the logs still show "notes=U" : [09/Dec/2008:16:36:38 +0100] conn=3817 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=40 etime=0.004000 notes=U ... Maybe there is a special type of index for server-side sorting like the one for the VLV?No. Do you have any problems if you search on those attributes without server side sorting?No, not really. It's more a request from our developers to simplify user sorting in their web applications.If i make the same search without the sorting the result is shown as indexed (no "notes=U") and takes two times less time :[09/Dec/2008:16:48:58 +0100] conn=3821 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=40 etime=0.002000
It's exactly the same search? Same base, scope, and filter?
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
