Re: Warning with vlvindex....

[Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Rich, 
>
> nsslapd-lastmod is not set, which means it is turned on. I assume that
> you would the timestamps anyway, if you have replicated environment.
>
> Are you going to open a bug, or should I do it?
>   
Go ahead and open a bug for this.  Thanks!
> -Reinhard 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich
> Megginson
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:08 PM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re:  Warning with vlvindex....
>
> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>   
> > Rich, I have just the suffix entry in the directory at this point. I 
> > load this ldif script during setup:
> > This seems to be fine:
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers finished; 
> > cleaning up...
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers cleaned up.
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Cleaning up producer 
> > thread...
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Indexing complete.
> > Post-process
> > ing...
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - Nothing to do to build ancestorid index
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Flushing caches...
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Closing files...
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - All database threads now stopped
> > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Import complete.
> > Processed 1 en
> > tries in 0 seconds. (inf entries/sec)
> >
> > Afterwards, I do my vlvindex on the timestamps. I guess that the 
> > import does not set createTimestamp and this is why I get the warning.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >   
> >     
> Sounds like at least two bugs
> 1) createTimestamp should be present, unless you have nsslapd-lastmod
> turned off.
> 2) vlvindex should not give an error message - either its a real error
> (not sure why) or the error message is spurious and should not be
> printed by default
>   
> > -Reinhard
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich 
> > Megginson
> > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:32 PM
> > To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> > Subject: Re:  Warning with vlvindex....
> >
> > Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> >   
> >     
> > > Rich,
> > >
> > > It seems to work. I will load a couple of thousands entries and do 
> > > some tests....
> > >   
> > >     
> > >       
> > Was the database empty when you ran vlvindex?  If not, what was in it?
> >   
> >     
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich 
> > > Megginson
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:46 PM
> > > To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> > > Subject: Re:  Warning with vlvindex....
> > >
> > > Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> > >   
> > >     
> > >       
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I built FDS 1.1.2 from scratch and installed and configured it. I 
> > > > get
> > > >       
> > > >         
> >   
> >     
> > > > the following warning, when I run a vlvindex. This used to run in 
> > > > any
> > > >       
> > > >         
> >   
> >     
> > > > 1.0.x and 1.1.0 release.
> > > >
> > > > [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - warning: ancestorid not indexed on 1
> > > > [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: WARNING: Failed to fetch 
> > > > subtree lists:  (-30990) DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair 
> > > > found
> > > >
> > > > [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Possibly the entrydn or 
> > > > ancestorid index is corrupted or does not exist.
> > > > [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Attempting brute-force 
> > > > method
> > > >     
> > > >       
> > > >         
> > >   
> > >     
> > >       
> > > > instead.
> > > > [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Finished indexing.
> > > >
> > > > Dows anybody has an idea?
> > > >
> > > >     
> > > >       
> > > >         
> > > Was the database empty when you started?  It looks as though it 
> > > completed - does the vlv index work?
> > >   
> > >     
> > >       
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Reinhard
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > -
> > > > -
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > > > Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> > > >   
> > > >     
> > > >       
> > > >         
> > > --
> > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > > Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> > >   
> > >     
> > >       
> > --
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >   
> >     
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users