Re: Simple Bind only in secured channel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dael Maselli wrote:
I'm going to explain it better.

I don't' want a user enter his credential in an unsecured channel.
First I thought to close 389 and allow only 636, but ldaps is now
deprecated

Well, most LDAP client software I know of support LDAP over pre-established SSL/TLS tunnel (often called LDAPS). StartTLS is often not supported by client software.

and so I need to allow also 389, but if the user do simple
bind before STARTTLS then credentials will be exposed.

That's the serious drawback of StartTLS ext. op.

I want something like Sendmail does: no clear text auth is allowed
unless the connection is SSL or STARTTLS based.

Not possible. Even if your server rejects the bind request the clear-text password is already sent over the wire.

Simply keep using LDAPS.

Ciao, Michael.

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux