It turns out I trusted the LDIF I was given a little too much. An
attribute was present that was not given a value. The value is not
strictly required in the schema but is checked by acis to determine what
fields may be returned in searches. With this field blank, the aci was
not allowing the entry to show in searches at all. This is obviously an
implementation issue on our end that needs to be fixed. My apologies
for cluttering your mailboxes.
Scott
Scott Lacy wrote:
Hi All,
I have an entry this morning that I have added via ldif. ldapmodify
gave no errors on the import, and the entry shows up in the backup
ldif I made of the database afterward. However, this user does not
show up in any searches. It is not an admin user, and is in the same
ou as the rest of the users. I did a larger ldif earlier this morning
of some additions and deletions, and they all seem to appear fine both
in the ldif and in searches. This is in 1.0.4. Any obvious things
that I'm missing or suggestions as to the problem?
Thanks,
Scott Lacy
Server Manager
Mercer University
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
