Ken Marsh wrote:
I don't think this - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2008-January/msg00040.html - or this - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2008-January/msg00014.html - are the same problem.Rich wrote: >Does anyone else have this problem? Yes, I have the exact same problem, on both RHELWS3 64-bit
There is no RHEL3 64-bit binary for Fedora DS. The RHEL3 32-bit binary for Fedora DS 1.0.4 will probably not work on a 64-bit system (e.g. attempts to load 32 bit perl modules into 64-bit /usr/bin/perl, Apache tries to load 32-bit modules into 64-bit /usr/sbin/httpd.worker, etc.)
I'm still not sure why the Fedora DS 1.0.4 FC6 x86_64 binary rpm doesn't work on EL5. I suppose you could try Fedora DS 1.1 - see http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes and especially http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Download#Enterprise_Linux_5and RHELS5/Xen 64-bit.
I might be able to help you if you could answer my questions, in reply to your original posts:If you view my other list contributions, not only does the Admin’s Apache Worker not work, none of the Admin templates are copied or configured, and the admin attributes are not present in the DS database.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2008-January/msg00036.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2008-January/msg00035.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2008-January/msg00041.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2007-December/msg00026.html
-Ken. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
