Re: tcp keepalive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




I doubt you need to use SO_KEEPALIVE. A couple of observations:

1. If you have ESTABLISHED state connections on one end that are not
in the same state on the peer, that would indicate something broken in the
network or the stack, rather than in the DS.

2. The DS already has connection timeout features that you can enable:
http://osdir.com/ml/redhat.fedora.directory.user/2006-04/msg00131.html


Gordon Messmer wrote:
This morning I noticed that one of my directory servers has hundreds of "ESTABLISHED" connections from a coworker's Linux host. The directory server is running RHEL4, kernel 2.6.9-55.ELsmp, and tcp_keepalive_time is set to 600. The client no longer shows an ESTABLISHED connection on the port that is reported by netstat on the directory server. It reports less than ten open connections.

I'm not sure whether or not an intermediary firewall is doing something bad, but I expected that the directory server would use setsockopt() to set SO_KEEPALIVE on its connections so that it could detect connections that die off. After 600 seconds of inactivity, the server should start sending probes, and then notify ns-slapd that the connection is closed.

I'm not sure how I might filter keepalive packets with tcpdump, so I'm not sure if I can verify that they're being used with that tool. Can anyone identify the code that *should* be setting SO_KEEPALIVE on the sockets, or otherwise speculate on why they might not be working?

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux