Richard Megginson wrote:
Vampire D wrote:
As I understand it, OpenLDAP doesn't perform all that well under a
high load.
OpenLDAP 2.3 does.
Howard Chu's "SambaXP" key notes certainly seem to make that argument.
He makes the bold claim that "OpenLDAP is the only directory software
that matters."
Do you agree? Is there a future for Fedora DS, or will OpenLDAP own the
Free Software directory service market? Will the two projects share
technology and converge?
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
