Re: Preparing to upgrade to fds 1.0.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bliss, Aaron wrote:
Yes, before the upgrade I was able to login with my userid, was not
fully qualified; I just tried fully qualifying my userid and it
works...not sure if this is a bug...
I'm really surprised that it ever worked. Did you have to do anything to make that work? I don't know how to make the console dialog box search somewhere other than o=NetscapeRoot.
Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard
Megginson
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:22 PM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re:  Preparing to upgrade to fds 1.0.4

Bliss, Aaron wrote:
More progress; I've been able to find the lonely password policy that
wasn't disabled; turns out the entire policy had to be disabled, not
just the password syntax checking piece; so the setup piece finished
without a hitch, Directory server shows version 1.0.4, however my
userid
is still unable to log into the console; this is so peculiar; I'm able
to login as admin only; the directory console error log shows "user
myuserid not found: /admin-serv/authenticate"; I've verified that
myuserid is listed as follows; after logging into the console with the
admin account, servername, server group, right click Administration
Server, set access permissions; I did the same for the Directory
Server.
I'm just not sure what/where else to check...it's almost as if
authenticating to the console is only searching the Netscape root, not
the user directory database...Any other ideas?  Thanks again.
So, before the upgrade, you were able to login to the console using a regular user account, and now you are not able to? Did you login with just your uid or did you have to specify your full DN?
Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Richard
Megginson
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:56 AM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re:  Preparing to upgrade to fds
1.0.4
Bliss, Aaron wrote:
I had both in place; a few users had individual password policies
that
I
disabled, as well as a global password policy
I just don't know.  The DN in question is under o=NetscapeRoot - I
doubt
you would have applied any user or subtree password policy there, so
it
must be the global password policy.  Are you using the console?  Can
you
verify that global password policy is disabled?
Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Richard
Megginson
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:49 AM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re:  Preparing to upgrade to fds
1.0.4
Bliss, Aaron wrote:
I thought that you might say that...I'm not really sure where else
there
would be a password policy getting applied, is there any kind of
custom
ldap query that I would use to figure what dn's the policy is
defined
at?  Thanks.
Are you using global password policy or per-user/per-subtree?
Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Richard
Megginson
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:02 AM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re:  Preparing to upgrade to fds
1.0.4
Bliss, Aaron wrote:
Yep, err=19 was in the output log...
<snip>
[21/Feb/2007:17:08:02 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103
nentries=0 etime=0
[21/Feb/2007:17:08:02 -0500] conn=0 op=11 MOD
dn="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server

Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoo
t", invalid password syntax
This means that there is still some password policy being applied.
I'm
not sure what's going on, but you need to make sure all password
policy
is disabled before running setup.


Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this electronic message is intended for
the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may
contain privileged or confidential information.  If the reader of
this
message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this
information
is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please
notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you
received.
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux