Request for any additional live experience issues with Fedora Multi-Master replication...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear All,

 

After a successful c. 3 month trial period of using Multi-Master (*4) replication (RHEL4) on our test networks we are planning to progress to live operation in the near term.

 

Since this trial went a little too well (…healthy paranoia!?) I would welcome any feedback with respect to other users’ experiences with live operation, for example:

 

1)       Your preferred approach to replacing a Master DS after underlying hardware failure, in terms of ensuring that recovery from the other three Masters is indeed achieved in a very timely manner (e.g. usage of any variants on forced replication updates?).

 

2)       Replication degradation and eventual recovery where the intermediate network links degrade appreciably or are completely lost for a significant period, before returning and allowing the replication to recover.

Thanks in advance!

 

Regards,

Kevin

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux