Jason Russler wrote:
This is, in a way, entirely inconsequential from a functional stand-point but: I performed an upgrade from 1.0.2 to1.0.3. The upgrade went fine (except the permissions on ~/slapd-blah/config and ~/slapd-blah/logs had to be changed back to what they were suppose to be) but when I start the console it shows a directory server version number of 1.0.2. Where is it getting that? /opt/fedora-ds/bin/slapd/server/ns-slapd showes Fedora-Directory/1.0.3 B2006.303.1845.I think it's because when you get the permission problem during setup (are you using SSL at all?), the upgrade process doesn't upgrade the ds version that the console uses. The authoritative version is the one reported by ns-slapd.
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
