Any thoughts on what logs from FDS would be slurp-able, or if FDS
supports writing that kind of replication log?
Originally the two came from the same code. Netscape Directory Server 1.x
used a replication mechanism that was derived from slurpd (but the slurp
functionality was included in the main server). That code used the older
slurp-compatible logging. The present day FDS has multi-master replication
that is entirely different and uses quite different logging. However,
for backwards
compatibility reasons (with older Netscape 4.x servers and before), the old
log format was preserved as a configurable option. Hence the thought that
possibly slurpd is still compabible with that legacy changelog format.
However, my personal recommendation would be that you get FDS
to build and run on SLES. My belief is that will be easier/quicker/cheaper
to do than to figure out if slurpd/FDS will work together. There are just
so many things that can go wrong, and proving that it works properly
is a non-trivial project.
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
