Oscar A. Valdez wrote:
El jue, 05-10-2006 a las 07:57 -0600, Richard Megginson escribió:We are making progress. Note that the next major (i.e. not patch) release of the product will use discrete RPM packaging, and each discrete RPM will have a buildable SRPM. http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Discrete_PackagingThanks for the info. 1) When do you expect the packages to be available?
Don't know. We are hoping to have a beta in the next couple of weeks.
We have proposed this to the Fedora DS community. There has been much, much heated debate on both sides of this issue. Some people vehemently oppose FHS package, some welcome and encourage it. The Fedora DS developers are still trying to figure out a way to do what's right for the community. We can certainly make it easy to build your own package from source using either FHS or self-contained style packaging. The real problem is that it is very difficult to provide binary packages and documentation for both formats . . .2) Will the FC5 packages conform to the FHS?
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
