Josh Kelley wrote:
I checked RFC 4513 - http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4513.txt - it doesn't say anything about the correct result code to return in this case, other than it is an error if anything other than success or bindinprogress is returned. You might want to ask on ldap@xxxxxxxxx or on IRC.freenode.net #ldap if there is a standard that covers this case.On 9/7/06, Richard Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Josh Kelley wrote: > Is this a bug in FDS? Or did I misconfigure something? Is there an > easy workaround? I'm not sure. Is it the LDAP resultCode that causes the OS X clients to fail, or is it the SASL return code?I assume it's the LDAP resultCode - the only SASL results that the client sees appears to be a text error message, and I doubt OS X bothers to parse that - but I don't know of an easy way to check.
Josh Kelley -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
