Re: Question re: {KERBEROS} syntax

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: Re: Question re: {KERBEROS} syntax
Also, is there a reason this (the pam_passthru) module is not distributed in the rpm?

Tom


On 7/25/06 4:32 PM, "Tom Ryan" <tomryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




On 7/25/06 4:22 PM, "Richard Megginson" <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I.e. Allow me to authenticate a user (irregardless of whether they
> have an account on the local system) by using the supplied simple bind
> credentials and attempting a kerberos validation of them.
Yes, because with the plugin, fedora ds simply passes the credentials
through to PAM, which can be configured to do kerberos auth (local or
remote). So, instead of using saslauthd (as in openldap) you just use
PAM to do the same thing.

I’m curious how the pam framework allows for a kerberos principal/realm and password to be checked...

I.e. Lets say, in openldap, I have {KERBEROS}user@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, under openldap, this works as expected.

You’re saying that I can use the pam pass through module and then put

rhuid: user@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

And then in /etc/pam.d/ldapserver (or whatever I compile it as the name to be), configure it in such a way that

Pam will return success..

Maybe pam_krb5.so?

Ahh.. Maybe no_user_check...

Now I see what you might be referring to..

Thanks!
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux