Re: Idle timeout recommendation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



DeMarco, Dennis wrote:

Under the performance tab, there is an idle timeout. Does anyone have any recommendations on this? I am not sure keeping it a 0 is good practice. You wouldn’t want to keep idle connections open and run out of file descriptors correct? Would 30 seconds seem reasonable?

It depends on your network. Are all of your clients going to be accessing the directory server via fast (100MB or 1GB) network connections? If so, then you could probably drop the idle timeout down to a few seconds (or lower). But if you have older networks or WAN/Dialup connections, you may have to make it longer.

Idle timeout. The time (in seconds) the server maintains an idle connection before terminating the connection. A value of 0 indicates no limit.

Thanks,

Dennis

*This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.*

------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux