Bingo! Down to 2 seconds! I had to add indexes on uidNumber and gidNumber.
Thanks,
Simon
Nathan Kinder wrote on 04/10/2006 04:07 PM:
Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that FDS is significantly slower in answering queries
than openldap. If I run 'ls -l /home' on the list of 64 home
directories whose owners are all different, I get the list back in 1
second if I use openldap. Version 7 of FDS took 16 seconds, and FDS
1.0.2 takes 12 seconds.
The docs mention increasing cache sides to improve performance, but my
cache is set to 10 M, which seems to be large enough, and the timing
does not improve if I run 'ls -l' repeatedly. Is there anything else I
can tune?
It sounds like the search is against an unindexed attribute. I'd take a
look at the search in your access log and check if it says "NOTES=U".
If so, that means that it is an unindexed search. You would need to
create the proper indexes for the search to improve the performance.
-NGK
Thanks,
Simon
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
Simon (Vsevolod ILyushchenko) simonf@xxxxxxxx
http://www.simonf.com
"Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought."
Henri Bergson
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
