Re: Re: [Fedora-directory-announce] Announcing Fedora Directory Server 1.0.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Les Mikesell wrote:

On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:05, Richard Megginson wrote:

In addition, there are no pre-built native 64 bit Apache and Perl binaries that we can use. We require native 64 bit because all of our components are native 64 bit, and we'd rather not get into the business of having to ship the full contingent of 32 bit components with our 64 bit distribution - harder to build, harder to manage, package size bloat, etc. etc.

Aren't libraries almost certain to get out of sync on platforms
with 32/64 bit capabilities if you don't bundle both versions
in all binary distributions?
I'm not sure I understand. For Solaris, we plan on having a native 32 bit version (only 32 bit components) and a native 64 bit version (only 64 bit components). Same as we have now on linux. The linux i386 packages contain only 32 bit components, and the x86_64 packages contain only 64 bit components.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux