François Beretti wrote:
That user is special, and there is lots of code in the server to handle this special case.Sorry for my late answer. When binding with cn=Directory Manager, the user does not exist. So the existance of the entry does not seem to be always requiered, does it ?
The other instance is when using pass through auth or chaining - the user is remote.
François 2006/2/23, David Boreham <david_list@xxxxxxxxxxx>:This would be a new feature. You'd need to write code to implement it (or someone would). Problem is that there are a bunch of places in the code where the existance of an entry with the bind identity is assumed. So it wouldn't be quite as simple as taking the cert DN and copying it into the bind DN for the session. -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
