Re: autofs & FDS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Pete Rowley <prowley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Susan wrote:
> >However, I now get this:
> >[root@cnyldap01 schema]# /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-cnyldap01/restart-slapd
> >[06/Feb/2006:13:34:09 -0500] dse - The entry cn=schema in file
> >/opt/fedora-ds/slapd-cnyldap01/config/schema/80autofs.ldif is invalid, error code 20 (Type or
> >value exists) - object class automount: The OID "1.3.6.1.1.1.1.9" is also used by the attribute
> >type "shadowInactive"
> >
> >Have you seen this error before?
> >
> >  
> >
> It is conflicting with the RFC2307 schema.  I don't know how this stuff 
> perpetuates (and this nonsense is everywhere, I have seen at least two 
> phony OIDs for this attribute alone) - but the automount attribute in 
> the linked schema has an OID stolen from RFC2307 and assigned by IANA to 
> shadowInactive.

Got it.  The problem is that the schema above is provided by what looks like a Redhat employee
which lends some credence to it.

 
> RFC2307bis is the first document to mention automount, and it designates 
> automount schema thus:

so, should I just use the RFC2307bis schema then?  I mean, looks like this RFC has expired and
there doesn't seem to be a replacement for the autofs attributes and object classes.

Uhm.. What's a gal to do then???

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux