On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 07:31 -0800, Susan wrote: > I was just wondering what the community thoughts are on the subject of root accounts in LDAP vs. > local. Some SAs in the company insist on keeping root passwords local in case of LDAP outage, > saying that root is too critical to be handed over to FDS. Personally, I think it's no big deal. > We have it local right now and every time an SA or a mgr quits, we've to login to every unix/linux > box and change root's password which is a real pain. > > What are your thoughts on the subject? Are there some accounts that you insist on keeping local > or is that line of thinking anachronistic? Keeping root local does make sense. Giving every SA the root password doesn't. Use something like sudo to restrict and log SA administrative tasks. They then use their own password to switch up to root privs to perform a task, it gets logged, etc. When they leave, their account gets disabled and they no longer have any way to get to root. You still need to ensure that they don't do bad stuff like create another acct with UID 0 or something that gives them a backdoor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
