Kevin M. Myer wrote:
Quoting Richard Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>:Yes, and that probably won't work in an upgrade installation situation. For upgrade, it's best to backup your data and security db files, and do a completely new installation. You should be able to save your data, database configuration, security configuration, replication configuration, etc., remove the old software, install the new software, and reapply your old data and config.There was a bug in the server - those files should be owned by "nobody" (or whatever your ns-slapd uid is). We have not tested upgrade install - there may be some problems with the console or other admin server functions because the admin server is radically different.Well, after spending a little time with it, I think a forced RPM upgrade can still be made to work, without doing a complete backup, uninstall, and new install. There are a few caveats, namely that the setup script (at least on my forced upgrade test server) failed to properly configure the admin server, which meant none of the Apache config files were generated.
Right. That's my main concern, along with some other file/directory configuration that setup does for admin server/console.
But I installed a fresh install on my workstation, and copied config files, made a few changes to them on my test installation and am up and running.
Ok.
Only issues I've seen so far are organizational charts throw an Apache server error (undefined symbol: PL_sv_undef at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line 229.),
What OS and version is this?
and from the Java console, my Administration Domain has disappeared. Haven't put a finger on that one yet.
I think that has to do with some info under o=netscaperoot that's using 4.0 or 7.0 or 7.1 or 71 instead of 1.0 or 10 e.g. the jar file names should be ds10.jar instead of ds71.jar.
Try a search like this:ldapsearch -T -b o=netscaperoot -D "cn=directory manager" -w password "objectclass=*" | grep 71
or grep 7.1 or grep 4.0 All of those will have to be replaced with 10 or 1.0.
And the speed boost going to Apache is amazing. I believe I saw a post in the dev archives about that (or maybe it was here) but seeing is definitely believing :)Kevin
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
