Re: role of uxwdog?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." <fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: role of uxwdog?
From: David Boreham <david_list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 07:26:13 -0700
In-reply-to: <436B698D.8080406@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20051104064645.26161.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <436B698D.8080406@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." <fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)

I don't know about a watchdog for ns-slapd, I'll leave that up to themore learned LDAP gurus.


Simple : The LDAP server never crashes.

;)


--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

Follow-Ups:
- Re: role of uxwdog?
  - From: Mike Jackson
- Re: role of uxwdog?
  - From: speedy zinc

References:
- role of uxwdog?
  - From: speedy zinc
- Re: role of uxwdog?
  - From: Rob Crittenden

Prev by Date: Re: role of uxwdog?
Next by Date: Re: what's wrong with this ACI?
Previous by thread: Re: role of uxwdog?
Next by thread: Re: role of uxwdog?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Directory Users] [Fedora Directory Devel] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Kernel] [Fedora Legacy] [Share Photos] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux