When tuning FDS on a Solaris machine, I've heard two different
suggestions about nsslapd-dbcachesize:
1. Decrease nsslapd-dbcachesize, and instead rely on Solaris' built-in
filesystem cache which performs better.
2. Tune nsslapd-dbcachesize up to a value that is at least as large as
the size of your backend LDBM database.
To know for sure which works best in my case, I'll need to test both of
course. But, does anyone have any thoughts or prior experience on which
of the above options performs better?
Thanks a lot,
-- George
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
