Re: OID conflict: ntGroupType vs. mailRoutingAddress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



George Holbert wrote:
I'm attempting to add a mail-routing draft schema (draft-lachman-laser-ldap-mail-routing-02.txt) to FDS.
The schema can be found here (among other places):
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/laser.txt

In an unusual and unfortunate coincidence, the mailRoutingAddress OID defined by the schema is the same as the OID for 'ntGroupType', which is defined in FDS' 50ns-directory.ldif schema.

 From 50ns-directory.ldif:
( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.47
 NAME 'ntGroupType'
 DESC 'Netscape defined attribute type'
 SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
 SINGLE-VALUE
 X-ORIGIN 'Netscape NT Synchronization'
)

The OID arc belongs to Netscape Directory server, and was submitted to alvestrand on Feb 11 1999:
	
	http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/2.16.840.1.113730.3.html



 From draft-lachman-laser-ldap-mail-routing-02.txt:
( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.47

 NAME 'mailRoutingAddress'
 DESC 'RFC 822 address to use when routing messages to
       the SMTP MTA of this recipient'
 EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match
 SYNTAX '1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26{256}'
 SINGLE-VALUE
)



This expired draft was first written in May 1999 by H. Lachman at Netscape:

http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-lachman-laser-ldap-mail-routing-00.txt


He was correct to use the Netscape ARC, and I don't see a more appropriate section:

	http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/2.16.840.1.113730.html



I can't say which came first, the draft, or the Netscape Messaging Server 4, which brought that schema, (as far as I can tell).


The most obvious solution is to change the OID of one of these. But which one should be changed, and to what? There's probably not really a single right answer, but if anyone else has happened to run into this, I'd be interested to hear how you resolved it.

I would say that the OID from the mail routing draft should be changed and you should file an "ITS" (bug report) at the OpenLDAP site. The conflicting OID is a company private OID, and is from an expired draft.


--
mike

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux