What implementation of Kerberos prefered?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." <fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: What implementation of Kerberos prefered?
From: Sam Tran <stlist@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:09:00 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=WDQn2P0LMdplZhAPuAnhbf3R3RrNfB9T8bBtuV98yn7IhKScRNtaH7cM++OqSreAUb2M0O93WAf5SQuhWJfOFCe91FqQd3bLRtTz4b6DVuTXkPlHcB8JMJGxMhrxsuxLRS7NWo6PoT7mzYyUKUiXZQ1ECV6wRIednmpkFD7kkkU=
Reply-to: Sam Tran <stlist@xxxxxxxxx>, "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." <fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx

Hi all,

I would like to know what implementation of Kerberos is prefered to
setup SASL/GESSAPI with Fedora DS: MIT or Heimdal?

Thanks for your comments.

Sam

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What implementation of Kerberos prefered?
  - From: David Boreham

Prev by Date: RE: support for non-localy stored passwords?
Next by Date: Re: What implementation of Kerberos prefered?
Previous by thread: users not showing up in directory listing
Next by thread: Re: What implementation of Kerberos prefered?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Directory Users] [Fedora Directory Devel] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Kernel] [Fedora Legacy] [Share Photos] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux