> -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Mike Jackson > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 1:03 PM > To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. > Subject: Re: Virtual DIT views vs > hierarchical DIT > > Pete Rowley wrote: > > > > Usually you give a third party application a base dn, that > base dn can > > be a view. Views were designed such that the client need > not know it > > is using a view based dit so compatibility isn't much of an > issue for most clients. > > > > And when the application needs to create it's own arbitrarily > named sub branches? I'm talking about applications like > Tivoli User Manager, etc. You mean a sub-branch in the view? That should work without issue. Do you have an example where compatibility like this is definitely broken? -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
