On 6/24/05, Mike Jackson <mj@xxxxxx> wrote: > Sam Tran wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just read about the virtual DIT views in the Red Hat Directory > > Server Deployment Guide. > > > > I was wondering how well the virtual DIT views work compare to an > > hierarchical DIT structure? > > > > Generally speaking is it better to have a flat DIT and virtual DIT > > views than an hierarchical DIT? > > Consider the following scenario: > > - 1 million user accounts > - 100 user groups > - 1000 authorization objects > - 6000 configuration objects > - 20 internal users for applications > > > Now, if you put them in seperate branches, then you can scope the > queries accordingly, and the scoping actually has some effect on search > response time. > > If you put them all in the same branch, e.g. the root, then scoping your > search to the virtual branches does not help to speed things up at all, > afaik. Also, you can exceed the lookthrough limits easier, which can > make things really slow. > > The law of directory maintenance is that the deeper the hierarchy, the > more likely it is to change. Because of this, I like to stay relatively > flat, not more than 2 levels deep in most cases. However, I still would > never design a flat DIT because I believe that it takes away flexibility > of some management applications, mostly third-party. And with third > party applications, you don't have the possibility to modify them to be > "view compatible". > Mike, Thanks for your insightful comment. Any other thoughts, anyone? Sam -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
