David Boreham wrote:
Bill Bradford wrote:There are some migration Perl scripts included with Fedora DS that may be of use. But they have not been updated for Sun DS 5.2.Actually, after posting I remembered that there is some 'official' supportOn 6/3/05, David Boreham <david_list@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Replication protocol compatibility with Sun isn't a supported or tested feature, but it should work provided Sun haven't changed their product to make it incompatible since the two codelines diverged.Anyone know exactly what the differences are between Fedora DS and Sun's current offering? We just rolled out Sun's DS, but if I can get the exact same functionality out of FedoraDS, I may switch to that instead and save the $$$ licensing fee. Now, to answer your question the two products have essentially theSun made some changes to their replication protocol for 5.2 to make it work better over a WAN. I'm not exactly sure what they did, but it might not be implemented the same way we did ours for 7.1. However, if you don't do WAN replication, then it probably doesn't make any difference. Did you want to know the differences between Sun DS and Fedora DS in replication functionality or in all areas? There are a few differences - Sun DS includes native support for DSMLv2, while we provide support in the form of a gateway. Sun DS 5.2 service pack 3 supports ModDN with new superior, Fedora DS only supports ModRDN (i.e. rename in place). Other than those two relatively minor differences, the two products are almost identical in functionality.
|
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users