Re: starting Fedora Server SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 14:00 +0200, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
> <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         
>         
>         Le Mer 12 novembre 2008 12:17, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
>         >
>         > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:23:42AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
>         >>
>         >> Not so bad - 145 packages, 110 MB
>         >
>         > I tried
>         >
>         > yum --installroot=/mnt/tmp/ install '@core' '@base'
>         >   -> 416 Packages, 257 M.
>         >
>         > and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11.
>         Should
>         > certainly be investigated.
>         
>         
>         That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been
>         discussed
>         previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in
>         server-side
>         stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used
>         only the
>         first part would not be fully lsb compliant)

> 
> LSB requests qt?

The LSB Desktop specs[1] requires them.

The LSB Core specs[2] don't.

I'd say this is a badly packaged package, which is in dire need of being
split ;)


Ralf


[1]
http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Desktop-generic/LSB-Desktop-generic/book1.html

[2]
http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/book1.html


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux