David Nielsen (gnomeuser@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > - mkinitrd > > - initscripts > > - X server > > - X drivers > > - kernel > > - gdm > > - mesa (?) > > > > ... at which point you're dragging back an awful lot. > > And if it's deemed stable enough for F10 as a release then surely it should > be stable enough as an update for F9. A big and not uncomplicated update > granted but we could in theory put this into updates-testing and roll it out > for F9 as well. For what gain, exactly? Do we really want to disrupt the paradigm of a stable release for existing users? > If the argument against doing this would be stability one > would be left questioning how F10 could be labelled stable in the fist > place. The argument against it is sanity. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
