On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:17 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 08:21 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > GCL will not run successfully if compiled with -fstack-protector. It
> > has its own internal stack management code that interacts badly with
> > -fstack-protector. So I decided to try filtering that option out of
> > the default CFLAGS. I put this at the top of the GCL spec file:
> >
> > %global __global_cflags %{echo %__global_cflags | %{__sed} 's/
> > -fstack-protector//'}
> >
> > That seems to work, in that %configure passes RPM_OPT_FLAGS minus
> > -fstack-protector, but when I run rpmbuild, I see:
> >
> > echoechoechoechoechoechoechoechoExecuting(%prep): ...
> >
> > What's with the 8 "echo" strings, one right after the other? Is that
> > something I should worry about? Am I filtering CFLAGS the right way?
> > Do I need to get explicit permission from some group to do this?
> > Thanks,
>
> In the X server, I do:
>
> export CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -Wstrict-overflow -rdynamic $CFLAGS"
> %configure --enable-maintainer-mode %{xservers} \
> # ...
>
> Which seems to work fine.
With modern configure scripts you can pass CFLAGS to configure directly
instead of resorting to using the environment.
Ralf
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
