Re: Proposal: Rolling Release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The real missing piece is 'undo' when you find out that a change in the new
> version breaks something that you need.  Does anyone know if that actually
> works on systems using conary (i.e. can you back up a major revision)?

Using hardlink forests, Scott's olpc-update does some of that. It's
not integrated to rpm/yum but it could easily be turned into a "cheap
snapshot" without having to wait for ZFS/BTRFS. I am not madly in love
with it, but it does its job.

You'll find - however- that applications and desktop environments
often upgrade their storage formats, so your downgrade path may be
well oiled in the rpm/yum sense, and yet completely unusable for end
users.

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux