Re: Flash 10 in 64-bit F9: does it work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 07:11:46AM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:

> I'm pretty sure it was the other way around. Fedora ships libcurl.so.4,
> not libcurl.so.3, and Flash 10 required the latter. I believe it will
> now use either, and dlopen()s whichever one it finds.

IIRC I read in the forum (Ubuntu?) where I found the libcurl suggestion
that those users had a problem because their distro had libcurl.so.3 and
that flash 10 needed libcurl.so.4.  But I'll soon know because I'll try
to get flash 10 working on RHEL5, having libcurl.so.3...

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux