Re: Concerns about 'provenpackager' and why I didn't mass ACL open

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 13:18 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> Trust: If I'm a new contributor who just needed to get X.Y.Z in because
> I just started using it on my shiny Fedora Desktop, I may not have any
> contact with any other Fedora Contributor.  If I don't trust the
> provenpackager group with this software, I'm not likely to trust an
> unknown packager who asks to be a comaintainer either.  In fact, if
> there was an over-all group of people who seldom make a mistake and know
> packaging and software backward and forward, I'm more likely to entrust
> that group with the ability to modify my package than the random packager.

To be fair, when I first proposed new maintainer containment, this above
was my vision for the elevated access group.

Unfortunately FESCo chose to fill that group with a much larger set of
people with nothing but "number of packages" as a requirement.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux